The 3 electrons

To well understand this text, it is necessary to read the preceding text " The electron in question ".

If you have admitted the reality of a tricolour electron, then see below: the electron, the muon, the tau, symbolized in an equilateral triangle, representative of the G3 group, on which is disposed, to each in a different order, their 3 charges of colour,

With the first glance, the 3 particles recognizes to him to the colour of the charge, placed to the top of their respective triangles: red to the electron, yellow to the muon, blue to the tau.

The physics elaborated a board in which the elementary particles are distributed in 3 generations. The electron is placed in the first, the one that constructs our universe. The muon and the tau are some settled heavy electrons because of their mass and fossil because of their age; the first, the least heavy, the muon, is placed in the second generation of the board, the second, the mastodon, the tau is visible in the third.

The mathematical group G3, inventor of the triangle, is formed by the 6 exchange of posts of the set {a, b, c} of 3 objects that can be disposed 6 different orders.

Here, the 3 objects are the 3 charges of colour of the quantum chromodynamique. Here is the six exchange of posts in which the red charges, yellow and blue are respectively symbolized by the letters a,b,c.

(a, b, c) (b,a, c) (c,b,a) (a,c,b) (b,c,a) (c,a,b)

The 3 first exchange of posts represent the electron, the muon and the tau that are some particles of matter symbolized by the 3 triangles above.

The 3 following exchange of posts represent the positon, the antimuon, the antitau, that are some antiparticles of antimatter symbolized by the 3 triangles below.

One can see, the 3 tops of the triangles of matter and the triangles of antimatter carries, in the same order: a,b,c the same charges of colour.

On the other hand, the two charges of the lower part: b and c exchanged posts in the triangles of antimatter, that is equivalent to the turning of the triangle, that rotates nowing in the sense: a->c->b, inverse of the one of the triangle of matter: a->b->c.

If the matter and the antimatter meets, their inverse rotations are annuled; and they are transformed into energy: some gamma rays of opposed sense, like one coulded establish it at the time of electrons collisions-positons.

Inversely, a photon of sufficient energy can create a couples matter-antimatter. One will return on this equivalence of the matter and the energy, that the reason remains still mysterious, but it fails first clears the case of the neutrino.

The representative triangle of the G3 group is a mathematical symbol, in physics, in the proposed diagram here; it symbolizes the neutrino, the particle without charge of colour. However, the triangle can associates to a, two or three charges of colour to constitute the quark, the antiquark or the electron. Then, all the particles, settled elementary are-they the association of charges of bearers colour and neutrinos An argument that occurs from far away could give some consistence to this idea.

But this diagram seems justified by the opinion of the astrophysicists to that, after the Big Bang, the temperature of the primordial sop were if colossal that all particle could be transformed in all other.

It is possible that, according to his variations, the bubbling energy of the primordial sop has, more or less, activated the rotation of the triangle of the particles, to the dawned that it ejects or recovers an or several charges of colour, according to the caprices of his forces centrifuge or centripetal. This phenomenon has, evidently, transformed a particle in another.

The neutrino do not carry of charge of colour, and yet it rotates. Why? Logically, to make rotate horsemanship, the mover, here the photon of course, must be central. And it fails, probably, spreads this process to all the particles and elementary antiparticles,

What this central photon looks like? It is punctiforme, like all the photons, including the one, author of the Big Bang, named cosmic singularity by the astrophysics, that has summer the vector of all the energy of the future universe. How the photon can-it is assimilated to a dawns? Without the math help, one would remain in the ignorance. Here is therefore a trial of explanation.

The component elementary thing of the universe, the three charges of colour, are orderly in the matter where one represents them by (a, b, c), but are no-arranged in the energy where one represents them, here, by {a, b, c} this disposition being demonstrated by of the embraces.

Not to be ordered means, that any charge of colour does not precede the other, nor in the space, nor in the time: they are therefore all three at the same time to the same place, that that transcends the notion of time and space. One can therefore, for want of anything better, represents this situation by a dawns.

Does it exist an experimental proof of this identity of composing between the matter and the energy? Yes, by two experiences already quoted.

First experience: a photon is transformed in an electron and a positon, compound each of 3 charges of colour. There is not a spontaneous generation. These charges pre-existed therefore in the photon, but under another form; they were not orderly.

Second experience, inverse of the first: when, in their collision, an electron and a positon annuls their opposed rotations then, by inertia, their charges of colour falls on their centre respective where they amalgamate.

Transformed then in energy, the charges of colour of the electron and the positon unites to their central photon to constitute the two observed gamma rays.

All that precedes is founded on the hypothesis according to which: the matter, the antimatter and the energy, same the one that makes rotate the neutrino, are all formed from the three charges of colour of the quantum chromodynamique.

What do you think about it?

* Sometimes the electron is known as white or colourless, that is contradictory because, into chromodynamic quantum, the white is the resultant of the three loads of color, while the colourless is the absence of the three loads of color, i.e. the neutrino.(see diagrams)